Adam Smith International
Request for Proposal (RFP) for a firm to conduct ‘Perception survey to assess regulatory compliance and regulatory bottlenecks for the businesses in Pakistan’
67 views
Posted date 22nd April, 2026 Last date to apply 5th May, 2026
Category Research
Type Consultancy Position 1


Text, letter

Description automatically generated with medium confidenceChart, waterfall chart

Description automatically generated


Request for Proposal (RFP) for a firm to conduct ‘Perception survey to assess regulatory compliance and regulatory bottlenecks for the businesses in Pakistan’   

Proposal Submission Deadline: 5 May 2026   




RFP Details

 

Name of the Assignment is:  Perception survey to assess regulatory compliance and regulatory bottlenecks for the businesses in Pakistan

 

The method of selection is Quality and Cost Based Selection (QCBS) Method 

 

Financial Proposal to be submitted together with Technical Proposal: Yes 

 

Proposals must be submitted no later than the following date and time:  Date: 5 May 2026.

 

Expected date for commencement of services: 15 May, 2026

 

Clarifications and queries should be directed to: [email protected] 

 

Pre bid meeting: No

 

Firms may prepare joint bids, or bid as a consortium with one lead firm: No

 

Amounts payable to the Firm under the contract to be subject to local taxation, stamp duty and service charges, if applicable: Yes

 

Firm must submit (i) the Technical Proposal, and (ii) the Financial Proposal. 

Soft copies to be sent to: [email protected]




Terms of Reference

  1. Brief overview 

Revenue Mobilisation, Investment and Trade (REMIT) programme is a nine-year (2019- 28) technical assistance programme funded by the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO), United Kingdom to support Pakistan in implementing strategic reforms in the realm of economic development, trade, investment and revenue mobilisation. The key outcomes under the programme will be contributing towards strengthening the macroeconomic stability and improving conditions for high and sustained growth, mutual prosperity, job creation and poverty reduction in Pakistan. More specifically, REMIT programme aims at supporting the Government of Pakistan in the following areas:

  1. Enhance revenue mobilisation capabilities and help raise the tax/GDP ratio by increasing the number of taxpayers; 

  2. Address the investment climate constraints faced by local and international businesses and support Pakistan in moving towards being one of the top reformer countries to do business in creating ease for businesses;

  3. Facilitate trade and drive competitiveness by reducing barriers to trade and reducing Pakistan’s trade deficit by helping increase exports; 

  4. Modernise formulation and implementation of macroeconomic policy to avoid future financial crises.

As part of the Investment Climate workstream, REMIT is supporting Board of Investment (BOI) to undertake a nationwide perception survey of private sector firms. The survey will aim to systematically assess regulatory constraints faced by businesses (domestic and foreign firms) across Pakistan and generate evidence-based insights to inform priority regulatory reforms under the Government’s ongoing reform agenda.

Through this assignment, REMIT will engage a firm to conduct a perception survey of businesses assessing the regulatory compliance and regulatory bottlenecks in all aspects of a business lifecycle – from starting and registering a business to operations and scalability

  1. Task Background

Through this assignment, the selected firm will work closely with BOI and REMIT to design and implement a comprehensive firm-level survey assessing regulatory burden across Pakistan’s private sector. The firm will analyse key regulatory bottlenecks and variations across firm size, sectors, and regions to highlight priority areas for reform. Based on these, the firm will support the generation of representative evidence on how businesses experience regulatory requirements in practice, with a particular focus on identifying procedural inefficiencies and administrative constraints. The assignment will further contribute to strengthening data-driven policymaking by developing actionable, evidence-based recommendations for regulatory improvements. The assignment will also capture the perspectives of UK-linked firms to inform targeted policy dialogue and strengthen bilateral economic engagement.

Finally, the assignment will lay the foundation for institutionalising the survey within government systems, enabling periodic tracking of regulatory burden and supporting continuous regulatory reform efforts.

  1. Objectives of the Assignment 

The objective of this assignment is to generate systematic evidence on the regulatory burden experienced by private sector firms in Pakistan and to identify priority regulatory bottlenecks affecting business activity.


Specifically, the assignment aims to:

  • Assess the perceived regulatory burden faced by private sector firms across key regulatory domains.

  • Identify major regulatory bottlenecks affecting business operations, including procedural delays, administrative complexity, and enforcement practices.

  • Analyse heterogeneity in regulatory perceptions across firm size, sectors, and geographic regions.

  • Capture the regulatory and business experience of UK-linked firms (including subsidiaries, joint ventures, and UK-invested firms) to inform targeted policy dialogue and bilateral economic engagement.

  • Provide evidence-based recommendations to inform regulatory reform priorities and policy interventions.

Scope of Work

The scope of work for this assignment includes the design, implementation, and analysis of a firm-level perception survey assessing regulatory burden in Pakistan. Key activities include:

  • Design a detailed survey methodology and sampling framework to ensure representative coverage across firm size, sectors, and geographic regions for the overall business sentiment.

  • Develop a structured questionnaire covering key regulatory domains affecting businesses. The survey instrument should cover regulatory areas including:


Area of Focus

Objective

Potential Survey Design

Firm Profile and Segmentation

Classify respondent firms to enable meaningful disaggregation of results across firm characteristics, sectors, and regions.

Firm size (micro, small, medium, large); sector and subsector; province/city/district; age of firm; legal status; formal vs semi-formal status; ownership characteristics (including women-owned/led firms); exporting vs non-exporting status; domestic vs foreign-linked business; number of employees; annual turnover band.

Overall Business Climate and Regulatory Burden Perception

Provide an overall barometer of firms’ perceptions of the business environment and regulatory burden.

Overall ease of doing business; perceived regulatory burden; change in regulatory burden over the last 1–2 years; main constraints faced by the firm; confidence in future regulatory improvements; time and management effort spent on regulatory compliance.

Business Entry, Registration, and Licensing

Assess the experience of firms in establishing and formalising businesses and obtaining required licenses.

Ease of business registration; number of registrations/approvals required; time required for registration; cost of registration; interaction with federal/provincial/local authorities; ease of obtaining sector-specific licenses; frequency of renewals; duplication in documentation; usefulness of digital registration systems; presence of informal payments (where feasible to capture).

Permits, NOCs, and Operating Approvals

Identify operational regulatory bottlenecks related to permits and approvals required to operate a business.

Construction permits; trade licenses; environmental approvals; municipal permissions; sector-specific NOCs; fire/safety/labour/health approvals; number of agencies involved; time predictability of approvals; clarity of requirements; frequency of repeated submissions; delays and causes of delays.

Tax Administration and Compliance

Assess the administrative burden associated with tax compliance beyond statutory tax rates.

Tax registration processes; complexity of income tax, sales tax, and provincial tax filing; time spent on compliance; frequency of interaction with tax authorities; clarity of tax rules and guidance; duplication between federal and provincial tax systems; refund delays; audit experience; digital filing usability; predictability and fairness of tax administration.

Inspections, Enforcement, and Regulatory Discretion

Examine how regulations are enforced and the extent of discretion exercised by inspectors and enforcement authorities.

Frequency of inspections; agencies conducting inspections; advance notice vs surprise inspections; overlap between inspectors; consistency of inspection criteria; documentation burden; perceived fairness and professionalism; scope for discretionary interpretation; availability of dispute or appeal mechanisms; pressure for informal payments (if appropriate).

Utilities and Service Connections

Assess administrative and regulatory barriers to accessing essential utilities required for business operations.

Electricity, gas, water, and sewerage connections; telecom and internet connectivity approvals; time taken for new connections; reliability of services; administrative complexity; number of offices involved; connection costs and hidden costs; complaint handling mechanisms.

Land, Property, and Location-Related Approvals

Examine regulatory processes related to land access, property registration, and location-based approvals.

Access to land or industrial space; property registration processes; transfer and mutation procedures; zoning and land-use approvals; lease/tenancy registration issues; title clarity; interaction with land administration authorities; time and cost involved; dispute risks.

Trade and Customs-Related Procedures

Assess regulatory and procedural constraints affecting exporters, importers, and firms dependent on imported inputs.

Customs clearance procedures; documentation requirements; time at ports and dry ports; interaction with customs and border agencies; predictability of valuation/classification; refunds, rebates, and duty drawback issues; import licensing and permits; export certification requirements; usability of digital trade platforms; coordination among border agencies.

Labour and Employment Compliance

Understand the regulatory burden associated with labour regulations and employment-related compliance requirements.

Registration with labour institutions; social security and EOBI compliance burden; hiring and termination procedures; recordkeeping requirements; workplace safety compliance; labour inspections; clarity of labour regulations; compliance burden relative to firm size.

Access to Regulatory Information and Digital Government Services

Evaluate transparency, accessibility, and usability of regulatory information and government digital services.

Ease of finding regulatory information; clarity of official guidance; availability of forms and fee schedules; usability of online portals; reliability and timeliness of information; reliance on intermediaries or agents; effectiveness of helplines and facilitation desks; availability of complaint redress mechanisms.

Dispute Resolution, Grievance Redress, and Appeals

Assess the ability of firms to challenge regulatory decisions and resolve disputes effectively.

Awareness of appeal mechanisms; ability to challenge regulatory decisions; speed and fairness of grievance handling; confidence in complaint redress institutions; commercial dispute resolution experience; contract enforcement challenges; use of administrative tribunals; trust in formal legal channels.

Cost of Compliance

Quantify the economic and administrative burden of regulatory compliance on firms.

Time spent by owners/management on compliance; staff resources dedicated to compliance; financial costs of licensing and approvals; consultancy or agent fees; costs of regulatory delays; compliance burden relative to operational effort; most costly regulatory processes.

Reform Priorities and Firm Recommendations

Identify priority reform areas and gather direct policy recommendations from firms.

Top three most burdensome regulatory areas; agencies requiring most reform; reforms that would most improve business growth; importance of simplification, digitisation, coordination, or legal reform; sector-specific reform priorities; recommendations from firms.


  • Design survey modules to capture both objective compliance experiences (time, cost, procedures) and subjective perceptions of regulatory burden.

  • Incorporate validation mechanisms such as anchoring scenarios and consistency checks to improve the reliability of responses.

  • Conduct pilot testing of the questionnaire and refine the survey instrument based on pilot results.

  • Develop a stratified sampling strategy to ensure adequate representation of firms across size categories, sectors, and regions.

  • Implement the survey through appropriate data collection methods such as face-to-face interviews and computer-assisted personal interviews with senior firm respondents.

  • A purposive and stratified sample of UK-linked firms will be developed in coordination with relevant stakeholders (e.g., BOI, BDHC, DBT), recognising that this population is smaller and structurally distinct from the broader SME universe.

  • A core questionnaire aligned with the main survey instrument will be applied to ensure comparability, with targeted additional probes where relevant (e.g., cross-border regulatory issues, investment facilitation, dispute resolution, FX processes).

  • Findings for the UK component will be analysed as a distinct analytical cohort, with careful interpretation of structural differences (firm size, sector, formality, regulatory exposure). Comparative insights with domestic firms—particularly SMEs—will be presented where methodologically appropriate, without conflating the two groups.

  • Conduct surveys with approximately 700 private sector firms across Pakistan including the designated segment of UK firms operating in Pakistan, in collaboration with REMIT, FCDO (Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office) and DBT (Department of Business and Trade -UK). 

  • Where appropriate, utilise established business forums (e.g., UK–Pakistan business councils, chambers of commerce, and similar platforms) to support survey outreach, facilitate engagement with firms, and/or present and discuss key findings with relevant stakeholders.

  • Ensure data quality through appropriate supervision, validation, and verification processes.

  • Analyse survey data using appropriate statistical techniques to identify key patterns and trends in regulatory burden.

  • Conduct comparative analysis across sectors, firm sizes, and geographic regions.

  • Identify regulatory bottlenecks and priority areas for policy intervention.

  • Prepare a comprehensive analytical report summarising key findings and policy implications.

  • Present survey findings through stakeholder consultations and policy roundtables.

  • Develop an institutionalisation plan to support repetitive surveys by the GOP. For this the following is expected:

    • Develop a standardised survey instrument incorporating learnings from actual first round survey, including clearly defined indicators and modules aligned with key regulatory domains

    • Deliver a replication toolkit enabling future rounds (including survey scripts, coding frameworks, and indicator definitions)

    • Conduct knowledge transfer sessions with relevant government counterparts (e.g., BOI and associated entities) to support future implementation

    • Provide guidance on periodicity and institutional anchoring of the survey within government systems.

  1. Functional Requirements

Timeline 

The firm is expected to deliver the following deliverables in 16 weeks after initiation of assignment: 

  1. Inception report: detailed methodology, sample design, and draft questionnaire

  2. Final Questionnaire: incorporating feedback from BOI, SIFC, REMIT and other relevant stakeholders

  3. Analytical Report: key findings, segmentation analysis, and policy recommendations with a segment focused on UK firms operating in Pakistan

  4. Stakeholder Consultative Roundtables and Handover for Institutionalization: findings and reform implications


Pakistan License, Clearance and Approvals

The prospective vendors will include in the timeline any time needed to obtain any licenses, clearances, and/or approvals required under local legal requirements to produce or deliver the products and/or services described in the Scope of Work.

Qualifications and Experience 

The firm should demonstrate strong experience in designing and implementing enterprise perception surveys and conducting analytical research on business environment and regulatory policy issues. More specifically, the technical skillset of the firm should demonstrate:

  • Expertise in designing and implementing large-scale firm-level or enterprise perception surveys.

  • Strong experience in quantitative research methods, survey design, and statistical sampling techniques.

  • Experience conducting business environment, investment climate, or regulatory burden diagnostics.

  • Expertise in regulatory policy analysis, including business licensing, taxation, inspections, trade procedures, and regulatory governance.

  • Strong capability in econometric and statistical analysis of survey datasets.

  • Proficiency in application of statistical software and familiarity with digital data collection tools.

  • Experience managing large-scale field data collection and supervising enumerator teams across multiple locations.

  • Demonstrated ability to ensure robust data quality control, validation, and verification processes.

  • Experience engaging with private sector stakeholders, including firms, chambers of commerce, and business associations.

  • Ability to translate survey findings into actionable policy recommendations for regulatory reform.

  • Experience working with governments, international development programmes, or donor-funded research assignments.

  1. Instructions to Bidders

Bidders should examine all Instructions, Terms and Conditions as given in the RFP. Failure to furnish information required in the RFP or submission of Bids not substantially responsive or viable in every respect will be at the Bidder’s risk and may result in rejection of the bids. Bidders should strictly submit the Bid as specified in the RFP, failing which the bids will be held as non-responsive and will be rejected. 

Bids shall comprise a single package containing two folders: 

  1. Technical Proposal  

  2. Financial Proposal 

Bidders should send soft copies of the Technical and Financial Proposal to the following address: 

Soft copies to be sent to: [email protected]

Proposal Weightings 

  1. Technical Proposal 

 

Evaluation 

Weighting 

Timelines

Bidders should outline milestones and timelines as per scope of work listed above to deliver the core and substantive outputs ensuring regular touch points with REMIT and BOI

10%

Experience/ credibility

Firm’s capacity to deliver through evidence of past performance and quality and relevance of past work and references. 

Bidders should include contact information for no less than three references from projects similar in size, application, and scope and a brief description of their implementation (including location and year). ASI reserves the right to request and check additional references.

Bidders should include in this section: 

  • Full legal name and address of the company

  • Corporate and tax registration documents

  • Year business was started or established

  • Full name of the legal representative (president or managing director) of the company

  • Name of any individuals or entities that own 50% of more of the company

35%

Approach and Methodology 

ASI will assess the quality of the response (proposal) based on the prospective firms’ approach to the assignment and the technical strength of the proposal. Approach and methodology should include, but not limited to, the following: 

  • A detailed survey methodology and implementation plan, clearly outlining the approach to survey design, sampling strategy (including stratification across firm size, sectors, and regions), data collection methods, and timelines aligned with each component of the ToRs.

  • A clear plan for ensuring data quality and integrity, including enumerator training, field supervision, back-checks, and data verification protocols.

  • A tailored approach for sampling, surveying, and analysing UK-based firms as a distinct cohort, while ensuring comparability with the broader private sector sample where appropriate.

  • Mechanisms to ensure sustainability and institutionalisation of the survey, including development of a standardised survey instrument, replication toolkit, and knowledge transfer to government counterparts for future rounds.

35%


  1. Financial Proposal 

 

Evaluation 

Weighting 

Financial Proposal

ASI expects the price to be cost effective and reasonable as per current market rates. The financial proposal will comprise the following: 

  • The financial proposal should be submitted with breakdown of costs.

  • The price quoted will be fixed for the entire contract. All prices are to be quoted in GBP £ and must clearly state all applicable taxes to be included in the quoted price. REMIT will not allow any compensation to the approved bidders for variation in the rate of exchange against dollar or any other currency. All offers in this respect should be firm and final.

The quoted price must include all taxes, installation/integration services and the costs of delivery/implementation in the required locations. 

20%

Prospective firms must be legally registered under the laws of the country in which they are organized and possess all licenses, permits and government approvals necessary for performance of the work. 

  1. Proposal Terms

  1. Prospective Firms’ Understanding of the Solicitation

Prospective contractors are responsible for understanding the solicitation in its entirety and each of its elements and should make inquiries to ASI as necessary to ensure such understanding. ASI reserves the right to disqualify any prospective vendor that it determines, at its sole discretion, does not understand the solicitation or any of its elements. Such disqualification shall be at no fault, cost, or liability whatsoever to ASI.

  1. Information from ASI

All information provided by ASI in this solicitation is subject to change at any time. ASI makes no certification as to the accuracy of any item and is not responsible or liable for any use of or reliance on the information or for any claims asserted therefrom.

  1. Communication

All communications related to the RFP must be in writing to the above-mentioned point of contact. Verbal communication shall not be effective unless formally confirmed in writing by the procurement official listed in a sealed envelope to our designated location in Lahore.

  1. Formal Communications shall include, but are not limited to the following:

  • Questions concerning this solicitation must be submitted in writing to the contact person mentioned above. 

  • Errors and omissions in this solicitation, as well as enhancements. Prospective firms should notify ASI of any discrepancies, errors, or omissions that may exist within this solicitation. Prospective vendors should recommend to ASI any enhancements to the work described in the solicitation which might be in ASI’s best interests.

  • Inquiries about technical interpretations must be directly asked from contact person (Bilal Hassan).

  1. Addenda: ASI will make a good-faith effort to provide a written response to the questions or requests for clarifications in the form of written responses or addenda in accordance with the Schedule of Events.

  2. Posting Online: Copy of this solicitation, will be available online at:  www.BrightSpyre.com.

  1. Non-Disclosure Agreement

ASI reserves the right to require the prospective firms to enter into a non-disclosure agreement.

  1. No Collusion

Collusion is strictly prohibited. Collusion is defined as an agreement or compact, written or oral, between two or more parties with the goal of limiting fair and open competition by deceiving, misleading, or defrauding a third party.

  1. Companies Owned or Controlled by Government

The prospective vendor must disclose in writing with its Response if a government, its agents, or agencies, have an ownership or managerial interest in the company. Failure to disclose a government ownership of managerial interest in the company will result in the prospective contractor’s offer being removed from consideration.

  1. Subcontracting

The prospective contractor must disclose in writing with its Response any subcontracting that will take place under an award. Failure to disclose subcontracting relationships will result in the prospective contractor’s offer being removed from consideration. (if permitted by the solicitation)

  1. Costs

The solicitation does not obligate ASI to pay for any costs, of any kind whatsoever, which may be incurred by a prospective contractor/vendor or third parties, in connection with the Response.

  1. Intellectual Property

Prospective vendors may not use any intellectual property of ASI including, but not limited to, all logos, trademarks, or trade names of ASI, at any time without the prior written approval of ASI.

  1.  Prospective Contractors’ Responses

All accepted Responses shall become the property of ASI and will not be returned.

  1.  Partial Awarding

ASI reserves the right to accept all or part of the Response when awarding a contract.

  1.  No Liability

ASI reserves the right to accept or reject any Response or to stop the procurement process at any time, without assigning any reason or liability. ASI shall not be liable to any prospective contractor, person, or entity for any losses, expenses, costs, claims, or damages of any kind.


Apply By:

 

Firm must submit (i) the Technical Proposal, and (ii) the Financial Proposal. 

Soft copies to be sent to: [email protected]

Related
Remote Medicolegal File Preparation Associate

Organizational Background - About Evaluate Medicolegal....

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL ....

Search